OUR APPROACH
Autonomy needs
a place in insurance.
A robot’s risk belongs to the work it does and the world around it.
Start where the machine works.
The same platform can stack boxes in a guarded factory cell or move through a shared corridor. The people, property and controls around it change the consequences of a mistake. Insurance should reflect that difference.
Look beyond the application.
Safety procedures, security controls, certifications, simulation results and telemetry help explain the risk that a form cannot capture. We use the evidence available for the deployment, including the times when a guard is open for setup or maintenance.
Give safer operations a reason to matter.
Underwriting should distinguish deployments with stronger controls and better operating evidence. As the robot, task or software changes, the assessment should change with it.